Even More Denominations

 Atheists, agnostics, and Gnostic claims that blare over the Internet claim to be the Truth, the biggest one being the evolutionary alternative to special creation.  But doesn't one see that evolutionary chaos is a reaction to special creation?  That the 'scientific' theory is actually dictated by its difference from special creation, rather than its relationship to reality?  This is why we have to take Sheldrake and others seriously.  Darwinian evolution is a species of special creation via negativa; although it denies the creator, it still relies for its existence on the existence of a creationist mythology to rankle against.

Evolution is not so much a true account of how the world came about, as it is a denial of how Christians say the world came about.  The 'denial of a Jewish deity' part may be true, but it is curious that the evolutionary story is so neatly opposite to what is claimed by the creationists.  

To go from 'God bringing things about instantly' to 'nothing somehow arranging itself over vast periods of time' is a little too neatly opposite itself to be plausible, no?

What did the Romans (J) Ever Do For Us?

 It's glaringly obvious.  The Romans and Greeks had philosophy, engineering, aesthetics, art, everything. The Js had NONE of this.  So how did they take over?  The Js gave us this notion of monotheism. And even that was a lie, because recent scholarship shows they originally believed Jehovah was basically Zeus, the head of a Divine Council, with a Loki/Satan like counterpart.  

The idea of monotheism equalised people, only after it was, perhaps admittedly, stolen from the Jews.  However, they thought they had the right to rule the world, so the theft is either ironic, or part of the Plan.

Supercessionism

 Picture a scenario where God says you Js are my Chosen People.  You are special and chosen, based on your bloodline.

But then I come visit you in human form.  You fail to recognise me and think I'm a blasphemer.  So God's response (despite knowing everything) is to curse you.

Now EVERYONE (ie. Gentiles) who recognises Jesus is the new Chosen, and any who remain true to their belief in the Old Covenant is cursed by God, to eternal conscious punishment.  Along with Gentiles who neither hear of Jesus or whom hear it but don't buy into the Jewish drama with their god.

Sounds like bullshit, right?

You Become What You Hate

 Jesse Peterson may have some questionable theology and it's hard to know sometimes how much of what he says is trolling, but I suspect (and hope) he's more serious more often than he's just joking.  He makes an interesting point in this video that 'you become what you hate'.  This is an excellent thing to bear in mind when pondering the JQ.  It's both necessary and legitimate to recognise that a certain 'revolutionary spirit' exists among a proportion of the people who identify as Js (what constitutes a J is itself a vexing question) and that this spirit is implacably opposed to Christianity.  

But if acknowledgement turns to hatred, then one's faith in Christ is at risk.  I've found myself striving to reject Christianity altogether (so far, without success, thanks to a very stubborn Holy Spirit commanding an army of hard working guardian angels) because I've been susceptible to the 'Identity Politics' based argument that Christianity is a Jewish psy-op intended to demoralise and disempower people of European descent.

I noticed early on when reading the works of Hitler esotericists Savitri Devi and Miguel Serrano that they embraced a white supremacist Myth of the Blood in response to the Jewish Myth of the Chosen bloodline.  They actually sought to mirror the behaviour and beliefs of those they abhorred.  

The loosest theological definition of a J is someone who 'rejects Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour, relying instead on his commitment to his racial heritage'.  Is that precisely what the Nazis did, supposedly in response to the JQ?

Be born again.  Forgive your parents.  Anger is evil.  Anger makes you female, and unable to control your emotions.  And the inability to control oneself makes you hate.  And you become what you hate.  Have no room inside you for hatred. 

Who'd a Thunk It?

 The moment I told my friend, Paul C, that I have a blog I found that all my motivation for writing was sapped completely.  Writing a Famous for Fifteen Minutes...if I say something, the motivation goes away and is replaced by anxiety and mental block.

Tell no one.  What then time is right.  Just do it.  In secret.

Why Peter and Not Paul?

 If it's all made up, as some contend, I have to ask why is Peter listed as the first Pope, and not Paul?  Paul had way more influence.  If this is some made up fabrication, why is it so poorly scripted?

But Will He Dare Call Out the Transgenders?

This is a good argument not just against the subjectivity of the Holy Spirit speaking to Protestant Christians interpreting God and the Bible for themselves, but the unreliability of feelings-based 'truth seeking' across the religious/nonreligious divide.  I wonder what MindShift Skeptic would say to people who feel they were born in the wrong body?  Or to people who choose to 'identify' as this, that, or the other, because they feel that that is who they are?  The scientific and psychology community has been going along with endorsing such feelings as 'true', now legally mandating recognition by all of society that there are many genders/sexes, etc.  Are such intuitions as innately unreliable as the intuitions falsely associated by Christians as the truth-telling voice of the Holy Spirit?  Should a 25 year old biological male be allowed to compete against teenaged girls in swimming because he feels that he's female?  I agree with Mindshift that listening to the Spirit, or any feelings-based intuition, is mistaking mental activity for Ghostly whisperings, but all he shows is that Christianity does not have a special inner 'objectivity' that differentiates it from the inner feelings of non-HolySpiriters.  Is he willing to apply this skeptical reasoning to other examples of dubious 'inner witness', or will his fear of cancelation and/or desire to replace his lost Christian faith with virtue-signalling progressivism cause him to restrict his brave debunking to only the Christian delusion?

Life as a Trailer for a Hebrew film

 I've been reading and watching quite a bit of James Tabor.  He referred me to Dale Alison, a scholar with whom I'm familiar but was hitherto unaware of his book Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet.

"Finally, a book that trumpets the return of the apocalyptic Jesus! Allison mounts a powerful counterattack against those who have spurned the view . . . that Jesus expected an imminent transformation in history as we know it. . . . Allison has produced a persuasive argument that will not be easily overturned and must not be ignored." ---Bart D. Ehrman University of North Carolina

Jesus expected an imminent transformation in history as we know it.  Sound familiar?  Films like 'Leave the World Behind'.  Survivalists, doomsday soothsayers...I mean, c'mon, the news is prepped to warn us of a coming apocalypse.  Tabor, himself, speaks candidly about preferring the Hebrew mode of living in this world, adopting Tikkun Olam and fixing the world so that the wolf (Mandela Effect?) lies down with the lamb.

And yet, the doomsday scribes announcing the problem of 'climate change' are predicting imminent change coming very very soon.  

I'm starting to see that Climate Change is to Hebraism, what Jesus's Second Coming is to Hellenism.  Or rather, that the threat of imminent change is a Hellenistic fear, demanding the need for salvation from this earth, that has bled over into Hebraic Tikkun Olanism and become a mixture of 'living in harmony' and 'the end is nigh' apocalyptic thinking. 

Christianity Meek and Mild

Why does Catholic Christianity present as so weak and unsure of itself, especially when compared against the confidence of Islam?  Western man, in general, is weak and degenerate, of course.  But what is the source of that weakness?  What is it about Catholicism today that makes most of us unable to push back with similar confidence against criticism from the world? 

White nationalist literature, in particular, claims that Christianity was always weak.  That belief in our Crucified Lord is the reason why Rome fell; that our alleged exultation of weakness is the reason why the 'Jews' dominate,us etc.  But these penny dreadful Hitler fans always come across as weak victims themselves, complaining about how their superior Aryan culture was conquered by those inferior to them.  And I am convinced by people like Miles Mathis, that most of the influential 'white nationalist' writers are not Intel agents and otherwise not who they appear to be.  

The actual truth is that Christianity, specifically Catholicism (Roman and Orthodox), WAS strong.  Catholics pushed back the Muslim hordes on numerous occasions.  Catholics tamed the barbarian heart and made it noble.  Catholics were inspired to greatness, building splendid architecture including cathedrals, creating great art, writing great literature; pushing for greater social equality and helping the poor.  So what happened?

The 'Holocaust'.  Yes, I've said it.  The last century has seen Christianity dethrone the Cross at Calvary with the gas chamber at Auschwitz, as title-holder to the Worst Event in Human History.  We aligned ourselves with monied interests that seemed to offer us prestige, but in fact, controlled what we are allowed to say and do.  Just look into the CIA's doctrinal program to change the teachings of the Catholic Church against the Judeo-Masonic heresy of Americanism, in exchange to geo-political favours.  Look into the history of the Scoffield Bible, with its emphasis on supporting Zionism, at the cost of fidelity to our Lord.  

We redirected our guilt as sinners away from the atonement and sanctifying grace of our Lord, and allowed those who hate Him to feed off all that yummy 'loosh', claiming it is theirs for the feasting, in retribution and recompense for two thousand years of Sicut Judaeis Non.

Look at the secular universities peddling their 'scholarly opinions' that Paul, in fact, invented Christianity; that the Gospels are late and that Jesus said virtually nothing of what is attributed to him.  News flash: none of these so-called scholars have access to any 'real' copies.   They have no secret documents that overturn 2000 years of Catholic Truth.  They have not cracked any Da Vinci Code and learned the Gnostic secrets of Jesus Christ.  They don't actually know anything; their job is to destroy knowledge through deconstruction and nominalism.  Their job, which they've done extremely well, is to forgo empirical evidence and focus instead on interpretation and narrative, appealing to phoney probabilities whose numbers are made up by a conjuring circlejerk of satanic scholars.  All they have worked toward and achieved is creating a falsifying  narrative of Christianity's origins and present it as 'the latest research'.

These false narratives are taught to eager young seminarians, destroying the faith of the innocent but credulous; while appealing to the avarice of the cynically motivated, who are rewarded with top ecclesiastical positions in the false Clown churches of England and other such abominations.  

I was in academia for a short time.  I excelled at first, but when I attended one of the top British universities to do a PhD, I swiftly discovered that Theology Departments are the worst places for people of faith.   I recall my first public lecture; I gave a gentle, breezy talk on G.K. Chesterton and the Laughter at the Heart of the Gospel.  The first 45 minutes went extremely well, but when I segued to my final section on how we could use Chesterton to spread the Gospel, it was as though I had sucked all the air out of the room.  The audience reverted to a stony silence, a panel of disapproving Sanhedrin.  I asked my supervisor afterwards what went wrong.  The normally affable chap looked at me in a manner I'd never seen on his face and replied, "This is a Theology Department.  We don't do religion here."

It was that moment I was realise that my academic life was over before it had even begun.  I had left a career in litigation to pursue an academic life in service to the Lord.  I had burned bridges in my legal career by taking a public stand for Christianity in Bermuda, writing letters to the newspaper, 'outing' myself as a gently conservative Christian.  In doing so, I had in the words of a childhood school chum who then worked for a top employment agency that I had made myself, "Unemployable.  You're not a homophobe, but companies don't like controversy and you're viewed as insufficiently enthusiastic about the LGBTQ community." 

Insufficiently enthusiastic.  That little phrase seared itself into my frontal lobe as a damning verdict against my soul.  And indeed it was.  Despite all my theatre work; despite many years of enduring friendships with a wide range of endearing degenerates (a label I attach to myself also), there is a short but consequential time in my life when I crossed a small cadre of powerful skittles activists who took it upon themselves to stone my career to death for daring to speak truth to power.  

The difference is that St. Stephen died a martyr's death for proclaiming the Gospel.  He is at least remembered well for making the ultimate sacrifice.  My life was spared such extreme punishment, but what happened afterwards was much worse.  The Anglican Church, chiefly through my spiritual director who had encouraged me to stand firm and use my status as a litigator to speak on the matter, completely abandoned me.  O, he continued to write the occasional reference letter on my behalf once I'd lost everything, but once he became Bishop, and started ordaining homosexuals and women (against everything he had preached when he was a mere pastor), the letters became less and less helpful.   

Moreover, a coldness developed between us.  He knew he was at least partially responsible for my employment problems and so, instead of righting the wrong by helping me pursue a career in the Anglican Church, he allowed himself to begin to hate me.  He kept it under wraps, but the change in his wife's demeanour around me was the obvious tell.  My overtures about seeking ordination in the Anglican Church were met with a lot of handwaving, budgetary concerns and the need to do at least 5 years of training placements overseas in inner-city areas of the UK...but just a few months ago, two women were ordained after completing an online Masters and helping out each week at their home church for a few years.  So much for hurdles.

Of course, they'll cite the fact I converted to Catholicism as The Reason for our estrangement, but that is a lie.  I left the Anglican Church because it left me out in the cold and I was forced to seek shelter elsewhere.

The story of my disastrous time at seminary in Rome is for another day.  For it was in the Rome specifically (not Catholicism proper) that I came to realise that all churches and denominations have been infiltrated.  There is no safe harbour anywhere.  We must use our discernment to find the genuine believers who exist estranged in different pockets of Christianity.  I used to have a more romantic notion of discernment - that the Good Guys have a visible inner light, and I prided myself on being able to spot the Holy Spirit - it felt like a spiritual gift.  But I have been wrong more than once.  The wolves among the sheep are easy to spot, but the serpents are more crafty.  

The serpents have infiltrated the Churches, the Universities, the Media, everything.  They have stolen our ability to feel joy and they have done it by making us feel guilty about ourselves and our faith.  The poor innocent serpent, with his beautiful scaly skin, is a victim of our bigotry, our hatred, all born out of resentment for his superior intellect and relationship to God.  We covet what the serpent has by his proximity to God, so we persecute him unjustly.  And now that we repent of bigotry, we must atone for our sins by listening to the serpent, secretly meekly with our mouths shut, letting him teach us correctly with his serpent tongue, and guide us in the ways of servant-ry.

And THAT is why we are losing to Islam.  We are footstools to a creature that lacks legs but keeps a boot in our face using lies, insinuations, and false narratives.  We are presented with a real threat in Islam but that is nothing new for it has always been a formidable and sometimes honourable foe; but it is the inner enemy, the Wormtongue that we have given dominion over the teachings of our Catholic Faith, that is far more deadly.  For its poison saps our energy and worse, makes us willing cattle offering our necks to the executioner's sword.

Revelation and Indoctrination

St. Augustine teaches us that we need only look at the behaviour of babies to accept the revelation of Original Sin.  I say that babies are innocent, with no knowledge of Hell until that revelation is forced upon our minds.  

If given the opportunity to go back in time and avoid hearing any version of any Christian Gospel, I would leap at the chance.  I would gladly risk the possibility that Hell might exist and await me, in exchange for a life free from imagining eternal horrors awaiting me after death.  

I do not doubt that God exists, in some form or other.  But I am convinced that He does not care to heed my calls for help.  My life is ruined; I squandered a lot of opportunities searching for Something that was never there. I have no idea how to revive anything.  All I see is loss, misery and suffering in the future.

A cautionary tale on how not to spend your life.  That's all I'm good for.

The Trouble with Christianity

 The Old Testament is the story of Yahweh's Covenant with the seed line of Abraham.  There is no Heaven nor Hell as we understand either term in the Hebrew world.  They live in the here and now.  But Yahweh is their patron, seeing them through years of hardship.  He promises them a Messiah, who one day will slay all their enemies, making them rulers over all nations of the world.

Lo!  One day, Jesus arrives, the promised Messiah, but he subverts Jewish expectations because he arrives proclaiming his Kingdom is not of this earth.  He's not a great warrior at all, but a charismatic magician who claims the authority to forgive sin and be one with the Father.  Accordingly, the majority of Jewish reject mim and the religious leaders conspire successfully to have him put to death by the Romans.

But He is resurrected, at least that's what a bunch of Jewish people are saying.  The earliest followers of Jesus are Jews, but most Jews have rejected Him and continue to await their Messiah.

But now, according to Paul, the Covenant with the seedling of Abraham is over.  Any Jew is welcome to proclaim Jesus as Messiah, but Paul tells us that God has changed His mind and now His Covenant is with all people of the world who recognise Christ as Messiah.  You can worship Jesus and you don't have to get circumsized.  Not even half off, it's free!  

But there's a catch: not only is the New Covenant open to all, it is also MANDATED to all.  All MUST believe, because as it turns out, accepting Jesus entails accepting the Old Testament story about how the world came about; how we are all under the curse of Adam and Eve's sin, something completely unknown to us until the Jews rejected Jesus and the Covenant was opened to the Gentiles.  

Now we are told, under the New Covenant, that God favours everyone except his old favourites, the Jews.  At the same time, however, he now condemns everyone, Jew and Gentile alike, to eternal conscious torment if they either a) fail to believe in Jesus; or b) fail to believe/acknowledge him correctly - as there is more than one competing version of the Gospel.  

We are told there is a Church that is the new Covenant, which split into 3 Churches over a 1000 years ago (Roman, Orthodox and Coptic).  Christ mandates membership, on pain of eternal torment or reward, in both the correct One True Church, and by acting correctly in regard to faith and works, but each Church teaches something different in that regard, too.  

Then there is a Reformation.  The Roman Church is rejected and some people in the West return to the Book as their primary authority instead of the Church, believing that they will receive the benefit of the new Covenant simply by believing in Christ.  But still they are confused, and 33,000 denominations follow, because they cannot agree on the proper formula for getting to Heaven, despite multiple confident proclamations of Good News for some and Bad News for everyone else.  

Guaranteed, however, that no matter how secure you feel as a Christ follower in your salvation, there is some Christian Church somewhere, that numbers you among the damned.  It is simply unavoidable.

The main point to all of this is that 'Salvation comes from the Jews' is only one side of it.  The threat of 'Damnation' came from the Jews also.  According to their own Book, there was no Heaven or Hell when God walked with the Jews of the Old Testament.  Nobody went to Heaven or Hell. There may have been a place called Sheol where everyone went and while it wasn't Paradise, it wasn't Hell either.  

But then Jesus the Jewish Messiah came (allegedly); the Jewish leaders rejected Him and lost their special status in the eyes of God.  But wait, what is this?  Out of nowhere, comes the Pharisee Paul (born Saul) who claims a vision of the Risen Lord told him to preach the Good News to Jew AND GENTILE alike.  And what is the Good News?  It's that the Jewish God is the greatest of all Gods and the only One you may worship; that he's really mad at everyone because of something Adam and Eve did; that we are all wretchedly evil and deserve, and are going to Hell.  Unless?  No worries.  Jesus came to save you.  Yes, you Gentile.  The Jewish Messiah who calls His people in the 4 Gospels and referred to you as dogs in Matthew and Mark, yes, he has changed his Mind and now calls you to believe in Him. 

Abandon your gods. Believe in the Jewish God, Jesus, and all that sin and damnation stuff we just told you about goes away...so long as you spend your life obeying the priests that run His Church.

And just remember, the only reason you're in this mess is because the people of the Old Testament rejected Him.  Now all people, Jew and Gentile alike, ALL are damned and MUST become worshippers of Yahweh if they are to have any chance at all of avoiding eternal conscious torment.  (and by the way, a predetermined number of you are destined to Hell because God knows everything so you kinda have free will, but not really)

Again, remember, had the Jews NOT rejected Christ, the Gentiles would never have known of Yahweh, and never would have come under the current threat of eternal damnation for failing to believe in Him.  We are told that God so loved the world, that He sent His Only Son to walk among His Chosen People.  And the punishment for their rejection of their Messiah, their action is our punishment, because now we are all born condemned, from smallest baby to oldest serial killer, to eternal hellfire if we fail to worship the Jew's Messiah...in a way that he's never made entirely clear because we have 1000s of Churches disagreeing over it.

And now, to really add icing on the cake, ever since that nasty bit of business in Europe during the Second World War, and the subsequent creation of a certain nation in the Middle East, our leaders have decided that it's time for are change.  We are now told that 2000 years of both Jews and Gentiles needing Christ for salvation was false.  We are told that the Old Covenant with the Jews actually remains valid, unbroken and eternal.  It turns out that the Jews do not need Jesus.  They can rely for their salvation on their continued relationship with Yahweh.  They do not need to convert to Christianity. 

Yup, that's right.  The Jewish rejection of Jesus achieved only two things.  It brought hellfire to the Gentiles and the Gentiles only.  The Jews are still the Chosen People and exempt from the consequences of rejecting Jesus.  If this new antisuccessionist view is true, it follows that the Jewish rejection of the Messiah brought the reality of eternal damnation down upon the Gentiles, courtesy of the Jewish God, but the Jews themselves are exempt.  Not only are they exempt, but they also get the benefit of Heaven.  All of them.  But only the Gentiles who worship Jesus correctly have a shot at Heaven.  The rest get Hell.  Where there will be no Jews because their Covenant with God is still valid despite kicking off the whole Heaven and Hell thing by their rejection of their Messiah.

But remember, and this is vital, even if the trendy new antisuccessionist view is wrong, and the Jews still 'need' Jesus, there would be no threat of Hellfire if the sheep Jesus came for had answered his call.

Thanks, guys.

I'm starting to see why some people see Christianity as a horrific psyop.  

Is this the first historical example of the Hegelian Dialect - Problem, Reaction, Solution? Pagans were free to live life to the fullest. Christ literally brought Hell to their lives.  The people react with fear and trembling, only for Christ to offer Himself to solve the problem in exchange for our submission to His Church and/or Word.  To make matters even worse, the offered solution is contested by various churches and denominations' versions of 'how to be saved', thereby making the solution ever more elusive, and Hell that much more of a paralysing threat preventing one from living life to the fullest.  

“The reason we are so controlled is not that we don't have the power to decide our own destiny, it is that we give that power away every minute of our lives. When something happens that we don't like, we look for someone else to blame. When there is a problem in the world, we say "What are they going to do about it". At which point they, who have secretly created the problem in the first place, respond to this demand by introducing a 'solution' - more centralisation of power and erosion of freedom. If you want to give more powers to the police, security agencies and military, and you want the public to demand you do it, then ensure there is more crime, violence and terrorism, and then it's a cinch to achieve your aims. Once the people are in fear of being burgled, mugged or bombed, they will demand that you take their freedom away to protect them from what they have been manipulated to fear. The Oklahoma bombing is a classic of this kind, as I detail in ..And The Truth Shall Set You Free. I call this technique problem-reaction-solution.

Create the problem, encourage the reaction "something must be done", and then offer the solution. It is summed up by the Freemason motto 'Ordo Ab Chao' -order out of chaos. Create the chaos and then offer the way to restore order. Your order. The masses are herded and directed by many and varios forms of emotional and mental control. It is the only way it coud be done.” (David Icke)

Icke may talk about Lizard People and a Hollow, Artificial Moon, but he seems to be rather on point here... 

   

N.T. Wright, Antichrist's Anglican Theologian

In March 2011 at the regional meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers, Bishop N.T. Wright attacked the majority of western Christians who consider their beliefs orthodox theology. Wright said:

"The western tradition, catholic and protestant, evangelical and liberal, charismatic and social-gospel, has managed for many centuries to screen out the central message of the New Testament, which isn’t that we are to escape the world and go to heaven, but rather that God’s sovereign, saving rule would come to birth ‘on earth as in heaven.'"

Quite a serious charge! Nevertheless, Wright makes no apologies. He uses strong language but, at the same time, expresses sadness. Why? Because he is afraid the charge is indeed true. Is he right? Have Christians missed it? Have we failed to live under the Word? Instead of allowing Scripture to shape our worldviews, are we guilty of attempting to grasp the Bible from on top – our interpretation of it? Unfortunately, I have to agree with Wright. But his charge prompts more questions: What is the root of the problem? Where does the idea to escape this world come from? These questions lead us back to Greek philosophy. - Tammy Barnet

And here we see, once again, N.T. Wright's antisupercessionism and political globalist bona fides.  He's paying lip service to 'on earth as in heaven but is promoting Tikkun Olam, which makes him a servant of the coming Antichrist.